Worldbid International Trade Leads Import Export b2b Marketplace

Home / Trade Leads Homepage / Category Offers / List Offers / Offer Details

View Offers to Buy: Equipment - Safety/Security

63 -- Security Upgrades at Forest Services Bldg. Davis/Elkins College & 911 Call Center (OB1946038) (2007-11-05)

This is a combined synopsis/solicitation for commercial items prepared in
accordance with the format in Subpart 12.6, as supplemented with additional
information included in this notice. This announcement constitutes the only
solicitation; proposals are being requested and a written solicitation will not
be issued.

ALL INQUIRIES/QUESTIONS MUST BE SUBMITTED NO LATER THAN ONE WEEK AFTER SYNOPSIS
IS POSTED IN FEDBIZOPPS.

DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF OFFER/PROPOSAL IS FRIDAY NOVEMBER 2, 2007 AT 1600
EDT.

This is a Request for Proposal (RFP)
The following Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Contract Provision(s) &
Clause(s) are applicable.

52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors ? Commercial
52.212-2 Evaluation ? Commercial Items
52.212-4 Contract Terms and Condtions ? Commercial Items
52.212-5 Contract Terms and Condtions Required to Implement Statutes or
Executive Orders ? Commercial Items

All offerors must submit a completed copy of the FAR Provision 52.212-3,
Offerors Represenations & Certifications ? Commerical Items with its proposal.

The FAR and applicable provisions and clauses in full text may be accessed at
www.arnet.gov/far

INTRODUCTION
In 2004 an Integrated Security Management System (ISMS) was installed at the
Forest Service Building in Elkins, WV. It is an integrated electronic system
made up of an integrated Access Control and Intrusion Detection subsystem as
well as a digital closed circuit television subsystem. This integrated system
controls entry into the Forest Service building, the areas within and provide
surveillance of both internal and external spaces. The ISMS central monitoring
station is located within the building's visitor reception area and is being
managed by a system administrator. The remote monitoring station is located
within the Elkins 911 Center and consists of an access control workstation.
Remote monitoring is done after normal working hours. This 911 Center allows
viewing of alarm data only. Remote camera viewing is also provided at this
location for visual assessment of Forest Service external spaces only through
the SmartSight Digital Recording Systems. In 2005, USDA established a
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Davis & Elkins College and installed
an integrated Security Management System on the college campus.

PURPOSE
The purpose of this requirement is to describe the security upgrades proposed
for the Forest Service (FS) Building, Elkins/Davis College and 911 Center
located in Elkins, WV. Specifically, this document defines the objectives for
the requirement in order to ensure its implementation.

SCOPE
Upgrade Work on Security System at Forest Service Building - Contractor shall
provide security installation and upgrades to the Integrated Security
Management System (ISMS), the 911 Center which provides after hours monitoring
of the Forest Service Building, and the Davis/Elkins college camera upgrades.
The following tasks shall be performed.

DELIVERABLES: Task A - Forest Service Building (1) Relocate the MDI Security
workstation, server, keypad and motion detector from room 101 into the
telephone closet located in the hall within a rack system to include procuring
an appropriate rack for the equipment. (2) Install a card reader on the
outside wall of the telephone closet where the security system will be
relocated. (3) Install a new Panasonic DVR system at the Forest Service
Building. TASK B - (1) Verify the Forest Service building connection to 911
Center. (2) Tie in the Forest Service DVRS to the 911 Center NVRS to provide
after hour viewing of cameras. TASK C - Davis/Elkins College (1) Install two
(2) cameras on the College gm, one on the left front corner and a second on the
right back corner. These cameras will be added into the college DVRS.

The below performance standard, allowable qualit level and monitoring method is
for each standard listed.

Performance Standard: No Deviation
Allowable Quality Level: Fully Operational System
Monitoring Method:100%

ACTIVITY: Security Upgrades at Forest Services Bldg. Davis/Elkins College &
911 Call Center
ACTIVITY OUTCOME:

PERFORMANCE STANDARDS:
(1) Relocate the MDI Security workstation, server, keypad and motion detector
from room 101 into the telephone closet located in the hall within a rack
system to include procuring an appropriate rack for the equipment

(2)Install a card reader on the outside wall of the telephone closet where the
security system will be relocated. (3) Install a new Panasonic DVR system at
the Forest Service Building.

(3)Verify the Forest Service building connection to 911 Center.

(4)Tie in the Forest Service DVRS to the 911 Center NVRS to provide after hour
viewing of cameras.

(5)Install two (2) cameras on the College gm, one on the left front corner and
a second on the right back corner. These cameras will be added into the
college DVRS. )end performance standards)

Incentives/Disincentives
Outstanding or unacceptable performance will be documented in Past Performance
reports.

The color CCTV must meet the following specifications:

COLOR CCTV CAMERA SPECIFICATIONS
The following specifications define the minimum acceptable characteristics for
color, pan-tilt -zoom (PTZ), cctv cameras in surveillance

SPECIFICATIONS: (Camera)
??n?nMean Time Before Failure ??.. .. 50,000 hours (minimum)
??n?nScanning Area ??????? ?? (maximum)
??n?nEffective Pixels ??????... 768(Horizontal) X 494 (Vertical)
??n?nHorizontal Scanning Frequency ? 15.734 Hz.
??n?nVertical Scanning Frequency ?? 59.94 Hz.
??n?nSynchronization ??????? Internal / Line Lock / Multiplexed Vertical Drive
??n?nVideo Output ????????.. 1 Volt (peak to peak)
??n?nHorizontal Resolution ?????. 480 lines at center ( minimum )
??n?nSignal to Noise Ratio ?????.. 50 db (minimum )
??n?nMinimum Illumination ????.. 0.06 lux ( at B / W ) , 1.0 lux (maximum) for
color.
??n?nElectronic Sensitivity Enhance ?.. 32X (minimum)
??n?nIris ??????????..?. Automatic / Manual
??n?nOptical Zoom Ratio ????..? 22X (minimum)
??n?nElectronic Zoom ??????.. 10X (minimum)
??n?nPanning Range ???????. 360 degrees (endless)
??n?nManual Panning Speed ???? Adjustable from 0.1 degree / second to 120
degrees / second.
??n?nPreset Mode Panning Speed ?? 280 degrees / second (minimum)
??n?nTilting Range ???????... 0 degrees to 180 degrees (minimum)
??n?nManual Tilting Speed ????.. Adjustable from 0.1 degrees / second to 120
degrees / second
??n?nPreset Mode Tilting Speed ??. 280 degrees per second (minimum).
??n?n90 Degree Tilt Picture Flip ??. Electronic Display Flip ( No mechanical
camera rotation at 90*)
??n?nNumber of Preset Positions ?.? 64 (minimum)
??n?nData Communication Port ??... RS-485 compatible
??n?nPower Source ???????.. 24 VAC, 60 Hz, 18 Watt (maximum)
??n?nAmbient Operating Temperature .. ?20 degrees F. to +122 degrees F. ( In
environmental enclosure )
??n?nBuilt-in Alphanumeric Display ?. Ye s
??n?nBuilt-in Auto Focus ?????.. Yes
??n?nBuilt-in Motion Detector ???.. Yes
??n?nDisplay Privacy Zone Masking ?. Yes
??n?nAutomatic Backlight Compensation Yes

PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE: Ninety (90) calendar days after receipt of order.

GOVERNMENT PERSONNEL: TBD

CONTRACTING OFFICER: Ms. Jodey Barnes-Edwards, 202-720-3009 or
[Please use the link below].

CONTRACTING OFFICER?S TECHNICAL REPRESENTATIVE (COTR): TBD

The successful contractor shall propose acceptable performance metrics and
industry standards for same/similar work.

Offerors will be evaluated on the following:

1. Contractor must have past experience supplying the same/similar
supplies and service to and be familiar with Federal facilities and
college campus? security systems and IT infrastructures.
The Government will evaluate the offeror?s understanding of the
requirement as evidenced by the offeror's response to the requirement. The
Government will examine the offeror's proposed quote to providing the
requirements of this solicitation and will evaluated the likelihood of
delivering complete, quality supplies and services meeting USDA needs as
illustrated.

2. Understanding of the requirements & contractor availability
The Government will evaluate the offeror?s understanding of the
requirement as evidenced by the offeror's response to the requirement. The
Government will examine the offeror's proposed quote to providing the
requirements of this solicitation and will evaluated the likelihood of
delivering complete, quality supplies and services meeting USDA needs as
illustrated.

3. Past Experience in providing and performing same/similar work.
The government will evaluate each offeror?s experience providing
services of a similar size, scope and complexity as proven by the successful
management of contracts of a
similar size, scope and complexity.

4. Past Performance
The Government will also evaluate each offeror?s past performance of
projects based upon customer satisfaction with the services provided on past
or current projects. Please provide at least three (3) references and/or
current contracts for the same/similar work required under this
solicitation. These references must include the name, telephone number,
contract number, length of service, dollar value of contract(s) and any other
pertinent information useful in making contact with the service
receiving organization.

DEFINITIONS OF RATINGS

EXCEPTIONAL:

Proposed management approach provides an excellent demonstration of the
contractor?s capacity to provide and integrate all of the technical components
of the work. The management plan contains an excellent approach for
accomplishing the work that significantly exceeds the schedule and performance
standards. The proposal provides a corporate commitment and has an excellent
approach to their non-technical experience and knowledge relative to planning,
organizing and carries out activities with clear lines of communication and
control. The management approach has major strengths and no weaknesses
identified, indicating that the proposed effort will significantly benefit the
Government.

VERY GOOD:

Proposed management approach provides a good demonstration of the contractor?s
capacity to provide and integrate all of the technical components of the work.
The management plan contains a good approach for accomplishing the work that
exceeds schedule and performance standards. The proposal provides a good
corporate commitment and has a good approach to their non-technical experience
and knowledge relative to planning, organizing and carries out activities with
clear lines of communication and control. The management approach has one or
more strengths and only minor weaknesses that can be easily corrected,
indicated the proposed effort will benefit the government.

SATISFACTORY:

Proposed management approach provides an acceptable demonstration of the
contractor?s capacity to provide and integrate all of the technical components
of the work. The management plan contains an acceptable approach for
accomplishing the work that exceeds schedule and performance standards. The
proposal provides an acceptable corporate commitment and has an acceptable
approach to their non-technical experience and knowledge relative to planning,
organizing and carries out activities with clear lines of communication and
control. The management approach has some strengths and only minor weaknesses
that can be corrected without major revisions, indicating the proposed effort
will benefit the government.

Evaluation meets requirements of the RFP. The offeror clearly demonstrates his
understanding by addressing all aspects of the requirements and submits
evidence of his capability, competence, resources, and experience.

POOR:

Proposed management approach provides a marginal demonstration of the
contractor?s capacity to provide and integrate all of the technical components
of the work. The management plan contains a shallow approach for accomplishing
the work that exceeds schedule and performance standards. The proposal
provides a marginal corporate commitment and has a shallow approach to their
non-technical experience and knowledge relative to planning, organizing and
carries out activities with clear lines of communication and control. The
management approach has minor strengths and major weaknesses, indicating the
proposed effort will minimally, but acceptably meet the Government?s
requirements

UNSATISFACTORY:

Evaluation is unacceptable: Offeror does not address the evaluation
requirements or addresses them so vaguely, incomprehensibly, incompatibly, or
incorrectly; as to be clearly unacceptable. The requirement can only be met
with major changes to the proposal.

DEFICIENCY:

A material failure of a proposal/quotation to meet a Government requirement or
a combination of significant weaknesses in a quotation that increases the risk
of unsuccessful performance to an unacceptable level.

WEAKNESS:

A flaw in the proposal/quotation that increases the risk of unsuccessful
performance. A ?significant weakness? in the proposal is a flow that
appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful performance.

Company Reports

Get the Dun & Bradstreet Report for Department of Agriculture, Office of Procurement a